Annex / by Jeremias Becker, Matthias Liess (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH - UFZ, Leipzig), Tjalling Jager (DEBtox Research, Stevensweert), Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Mathias Franz (Leibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung, Berlin) ; on behalf of the German Environment Agency

Anzeigen / Download9.88 MB

Discovery

URN

urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-1060991

DOI

ISBN

ISSN

Beiträger

Körperschaft

Erschienen

Dessau-Roßlau : Umweltbundesamt, 2024

Umfang

1 Online-Ressource (96 Seiten, 9,87 MB) : Diagramme, Illustrationen

Ausgabevermerk

Sprache

eng

Anmerkungen

Inhaltliche Zusammenfassung

Mechanistic effect models (MEM) have become increasingly popular in the field of environmental risk assessment (ERA) of plant protection products. However there remains numerous open questions to risk assessors, modelers, applicants and the public. This report provides a scientific evaluation of 11 MEM or MEM families. It also critically assesses their relevance for ERA (e.g. as a refinement tool), based on case studies. Finally, the report offers suggestions for future improvements in model development for implementation in ERA. Outcomes were discussed with experts from industries, consultancies, academia and agencies at a European symposium (19-20 Sept 2019, Berlin); the presentations and minutes are available in the annex.

Schriftenreihe

Gesamttitel

Band

2

Zeitschriftentitel

Bandtitel

Beschreibung

Schlagwörter

Zitierform

enthaltene Monographien

enthalten in mehrteiligem Werk

Mehrteiliges Werk
Critical evaluation of effect models for the risk assessment of plant protection products / by Jeremias Becker, Matthias Liess (Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research GmbH - UFZ, Leipzig), Tjalling Jager (DEBtox Research, Stevensweert), Stephanie Kramer-Schadt, Mathias Franz (Leibniz-Institut für Zoo- und Wildtierforschung, Berlin) ; on behalf of the German Environment Agency
Mechanistic effect models (MEM) have become increasingly popular in the field of environmental risk assessment (ERA) of plant protection products. However there remains numerous open questions to risk assessors, modelers, applicants and the public. This report provides a scientific evaluation of 11 MEM or MEM families. It also critically assesses their relevance for ERA (e.g. as a refinement tool), based on case studies. Finally, the report offers suggestions for future improvements in model development for implementation in ERA. Outcomes were discussed with experts from industries, consultancies, academia and agencies at a European symposium (19-20 Sept 2019, Berlin); the presentations and minutes are available in the annex.

Vorgänger dieser Zeitschrift

Nachfolger dieser Zeitschrift