Akcigit, UfukAlp, HarunDiegmann, AndréSerrano-Velarde, NicolasLeibniz-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung Halle2025-05-312024kxp: 1901030032https://epflicht.bibliothek.uni-halle.de/handle/123456789/144411901030032urn:nbn:de:gbv:3:2-10817653309524We examine effects of government-imposed employment targets on firm behavior. Theoretically, such policies create “polarization,“ causing low-productivity firms to exit the market while others temporarily distort their employment upward. Dynamically, firms are incentivized to improve productivity to meet targets. Using novel data from East German firms post-privatization, we find that firms with binding employment targets experienced 25% higher annual employment growth, a 1.1% higher annual exit probability, and 10% higher annual productivity growth over the target period. Structural estimates reveal substantial misallocation of labor across firms and that subsidizing productivity growth would yield twice the long term increases in employment.1 Online-Ressource (III, 71 Seiten, 6,73 MB) : Diagrammeenghttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/industrial policyprivatizationsproductivitysize-dependent regulations330Book